Skip to content
Access: Anonymous access. Content follows.

Insights · NFL

What happened. What we learned.

Every graded pick, wins and losses, in one place. Read the record beside the proof, then see which angles held up.

What's working this month

Lenses that beat the others' hit rate this month, by market condition. Each has at least 50 graded picks.

Public Fade overall
Lift vs other lenses
+15.8%
95% CI
+3.9% to +25.9%
n
74
Divisional Primetime Combo overall
Lift vs other lenses
+6.8%
95% CI
−1.4% to +14.6%
n
152
Contrarian overall
Lift vs other lenses
+5.3%
95% CI
−7.9% to +17.6%
n
60
Home Dog Primetime overall
Lift vs other lenses
+4.0%
95% CI
−3.7% to +11.5%
n
172
Wind Under overall
Lift vs other lenses
+3.9%
95% CI
−4.5% to +12.0%
n
144
Steam Move overall
Lift vs other lenses
+3.8%
95% CI
−7.8% to +14.9%
n
75
Modeler overall
Lift vs other lenses
+3.4%
95% CI
−9.7% to +15.9%
n
60
Prime Time Under overall
Lift vs other lenses
+2.7%
95% CI
−3.2% to +8.6%
n
300
Divisional Dog overall
Lift vs other lenses
+2.5%
95% CI
−3.4% to +8.4%
n
300
Rest Edge overall
Lift vs other lenses
+2.1%
95% CI
−3.9% to +8.0%
n
300
Line Value overall
Lift vs other lenses
+2.1%
95% CI
−3.9% to +7.9%
n
300
Primetime Dog overall
Lift vs other lenses
+1.7%
95% CI
−4.3% to +7.6%
n
300

Not working this month

Lenses that trailed the others' hit rate this month, with at least 50 graded picks each.

Model Market Gap overall
Lift vs other lenses
−19.2%
95% CI
−29.9% to −6.5%
n
60
Model Edge overall
Lift vs other lenses
−14.4%
95% CI
−26.9% to +0.1%
n
52
ML Divisional Dog overall
Lift vs other lenses
−10.8%
95% CI
−16.5% to −4.9%
n
300
Sharp overall
Lift vs other lenses
−7.6%
95% CI
−20.0% to +5.5%
n
60
Splits Divergence overall
Lift vs other lenses
−6.6%
95% CI
−19.9% to +7.6%
n
51
Sharp Vs Public overall
Lift vs other lenses
−6.6%
95% CI
−19.9% to +7.6%
n
51
QB Out overall
Lift vs other lenses
−4.9%
95% CI
−14.1% to +4.5%
n
113
Cold Weather Late Season Total overall
Lift vs other lenses
−3.6%
95% CI
−14.1% to +7.0%
n
86
Short Week Both Sides Total overall
Lift vs other lenses
−0.4%
95% CI
−9.2% to +8.3%
n
126
ATS Streak Regression overall
Lift vs other lenses
−0.2%
95% CI
−6.1% to +5.7%
n
300

Receipts · NFL

graded plays (all markets)

Ready

8303

as of Oct 13

ATS (spread)

Ready

66.7%

24-12-3 · NFL ATS, last 90 days · n=36 decided · cover baseline 50.0%

as of Oct 13

Live picks · last 90 days · n=36 · through Oct 13, 1:32 AM ET

avg CLV

—

CLV accrues from August 31, 2026. CLV measured on 7,515 of 111,453 graded picks; the rest carry no pick-time price and are excluded rather than counted as zero.

as of Oct 13

beat the close

Ready

38%

Share of the 7,515 picks with a closing-line measurement.

as of Oct 13

24-12

66.7%

NFL ATS, last 90 days

n=36

Live picks · last 90 days · n=36 · through Oct 13, 1:32 AM ET
<iframe src="https://sharksnip.com/insights/receipts/share?sport=nfl&h=1eae772dfcff7bda" width="100%" height="260" style="border:0;border-radius:12px;overflow:hidden" title="House receipts share card — Shark Snip" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Cleared the cover baseline. A spread play must win above 50.0% to beat the coin flip. This record wins 66.7% ATS across 36 decided spread plays.

n=8303 graded plays · last graded game Oct 13, 1:32 AM ET

Build from these receipts →

Cumulative settled-result trend

12-5 (70.6% ATS)

17 settled picks

24-12 · 66.7% · NFL ATS, last 90 days · n=36

The line counts the newest 17 of 36 graded picks. Each win moves it up one step and each loss down one step. It is a record of past results, not a promise.

Live picks · last 90 days · n=36 · through Oct 13, 1:32 AM ET

small n · n=36

The plain numbers

24–12

Record, n=36

66.7%

Hit rate on spread picks, n=36

38%

Share of n=7,515 picks that beat the closing line

Early sample · 36 of 50 plays. Too few graded picks to read as a trend.

NFL ATS, last 90 days· 3 pushes, not in the record

Last 20 picks: 12 wins, 5 losses. Tall bar = win, short red bar = loss.

12-5 · 71%

last 20 settled picks · n=17

Longest losing run in these 20: 2

Live picks · last 90 days · n=36 · through Oct 13, 12:08 AM ET

Last graded pick Oct 13, 12:08 AM ET

Where the house loses · Residual angle

Every graded spread play split into disjoint side x line-size slices; up to three furthest below the house baseline, with no winning slice substituted.

Baseline 46.1% ATS on n=3,942 decided · as of Oct 14

Too few picks to rank (under 100 decided): Home favourites · 7+ n=31 · Road favourites · 7+ n=4

Market movement · biggest movers

How the lines for the next games moved over the last 24 hours, ranked by the biggest move on the spread (or the total, then the moneyline, when a game has no spread history).

  • NE @ CHI

    Home spread

    -2.5 → -1.5 (+1) · Toward NE

  • PIT @ NO

    Home spread

    1.5 → 2.5 (+1) · Toward PIT

  • BUF @ LV

    Home spread

    5.9 → 5 (-0.9) · Toward LV

  • NO @ NYG

    Home spread

    0.6 → 1.3 (+0.6) · Toward NO

  • DAL @ GB

    Home spread

    -0.9 → -1.5 (-0.6) · Toward GB

  • SEA @ DEN

    Home spread

    3 → 2.5 (-0.5) · Toward DEN

6 of 16 upcoming games shown, ranked by size of move, last 24 hours· latest line recorded Oct 14, 5:07 AM ET

Lift across 22 lenses

Each dot is a lens. Right of zero beat the other lenses; left of zero did worse. The line through each dot is its 95% range, so a line that crosses zero is inside the noise.

  • Public Fade n=74
  • Divisional Primetime Combo n=152
  • Contrarian n=60
  • Home Dog Primetime n=172
  • Wind Under n=144
  • Steam Move n=75
  • Modeler n=60
  • Prime Time Under n=300
  • Divisional Dog n=300
  • Rest Edge n=300
  • Line Value n=300
  • Primetime Dog n=300
  • ATS Streak Regression n=300
  • Short Week Both Sides Total n=126
  • Cold Weather Late Season Total n=86
  • QB Out n=113
  • Splits Divergence n=51
  • Sharp Vs Public n=51
  • Sharp n=60
  • ML Divisional Dog n=300
  • Model Edge n=52
  • Model Market Gap n=60

Lift is in points of hit rate against the other lenses. n per lens: 51 to 300 graded signals. As of Oct 14, 2:41 AM ET.

What held up, and what did not

The lenses holding up best and the ones trailing most this month.

Ahead of the others · overall

Public Fade

+15.8%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range +3.9% to +25.9%. Holding up

n=74 graded signals

Ahead of the others · overall

Divisional Primetime Combo

+6.8%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range −1.4% to +14.6%. Inside the noise

n=152 graded signals

Ahead of the others · overall

Contrarian

+5.3%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range −7.9% to +17.6%. Inside the noise

n=60 graded signals

Behind the others · overall

Model Market Gap

−19.2%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range −29.9% to −6.5%. Trailing

n=60 graded signals

Behind the others · overall

Model Edge

−14.4%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range −26.9% to +0.1%. Inside the noise

n=52 graded signals

Behind the others · overall

ML Divisional Dog

−10.8%

Hit rate against the other lenses this month.

95% range −16.5% to −4.9%. Trailing

n=300 graded signals

Weekly lens report, hourly, read Oct 13, 11:41 PM PT· older than usual

Lens calibration · did they know what they knew?

No data

No lens has graded claims yet

Lens calibration counts only graded calls whose confidence was recorded before kickoff. None have graded yet, so each lens has 0 claims. It fills in as calls grade.

Reliability · house ATS model

Waiting for graded picks

No graded pick with a pre-kickoff confidence is on record for this scope yet.

Window
ATS spread
Showing
Calibration of graded picks
No data

No graded ATS spread calibration yet

The season record above counts every graded pick. This chart counts only graded picks whose confidence was recorded before kickoff, and none of those have graded yet. It fills in as they grade.

Unlock more Insights tools

Keep exploring for free, or unlock the complete Insights toolkit with Pro.

$1 first week, then $2.99/week.

See Pro
The graded field

Insights · real claim grader

The graded field: the market, mined

Every pundit claim in the transcript corpus, typed and graded against what actually happened. Who has been right, who has enough evidence to judge, and where the observed field sits against the house sample and fade gates.

24 decided grades across 1 real sources · all-time window · small samples are labeled as such. Coverage: top-decile and quadrant labels describe only the currently graded field, not ungraded or unresolved calls.

Claims graded as of Oct 7, 3:54 AM ET · Source registry as of Oct 13, 3:15 AM ET

Pundit claim grading

newest 6 decided claims · same rows as the ledger

ClaimSourceVerdict
“but I'm still gonna pick the Ravens.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29wrong
“I'm gonna pick the Bills.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29correct
“I still think that the Rams have a better chance because of their consistency.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29wrong
“I still think the Jets would be able to win.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29correct
“I'm gonna pick the Browns.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29wrong
“I'm gonna pick the Raiders.”Ben Solak (The Football Show) · Oct 29wrong

Pundit ledger

Decided, transcript-backed calls by real source. Pushes and unresolved claims never enter the hit-rate denominator.

correct and wrong calls only quoted from the transcript
SourceW-LHit %nWindowVerdict
Ben Solak (The Football Show) 14-1058.3%24all-timehot

24 decided grades across 1 real sources · all-time window

Verdict rules: unproven below n=20; gasbag below 45% after the gate; hot is the top decile of the gated field. With a thin gated field, hot is field-relative coverage, not a claim about ungraded calls.

Gasbag quadrant

More decided claims move right; a higher correct/wrong hit rate moves up. Every dot is a directly labeled real source.

correct + wrong only all-time
Pundit sample size versus hit rateZero-based scatter of provenance-clean decided claims. The vertical gate is n=20 and the horizontal gate is a 45 percent hit rate.n=20 gate45% hitprovenBen Solak (The Football Show): 14-10, 58.3%, n=24Ben Solak (The Football Show)0400%100%graded claims (x-axis starts at 0)hit rate

Counterfactual boundary: the guide lines classify observed grades only; they do not infer how a source would have performed on unresolved or unmade calls.