Skip to content
CURRENT
-7.5 → -6 (+1.5) over 24 captures ATL @ GB spread -7.5 → -6 house House backtest last 10: 6–4 · 90-day all-market 55.3% (n=8163) · 22h ago Wire Peyton fumes over INT while 'Breaking Bad' star Bryan Cranston celebrates Wire Sources: Colts' Pierce out weeks; hoping for return midseason Wire Giants QB Jaxson Dart exits MNF game vs. Rams with knee injury
Access: Anonymous access. Content follows.
shark-snips

The Odds Converter Won’t Save You From a Hot Take

Read the price, role, and market first Pinnacle, DraftKings and Bovada priced side by side on two Week 1 games: the exact hold each book carries, from 3.25% to 4.87%.

5 sections

Marisa Vega

Retired byline of the Shark Snip desk for market and line-movement coverage. Kept for the posts published under it before 2026-09-09.

Key takeaways (from article sections)

  • Same game, three books, three cuts
  • Converting each book's pair
  • A second game, the same pattern
  • What the hold figure actually measures
  • What the Number Says

Updated Sep 7, 2026 · Week 1 board.

Same game, three books, three cuts

Pinnacle prices Browns at Jaguars (Sunday, Sep 13, 1:00 PM ET kickoff) at -391 for the Jaguars and +316 for the Browns. DraftKings has the same game at -440 and +340. Bovada has it at -420 and +315. One game, three books, three different moneylines, all quoted inside the same stretch of one afternoon. No read on either team accounts for that. Each book picked its own price.

Converting each book's pair

Two formulas do all of it. A negative price gets its size divided by itself plus 100. A positive one gets 100 put over the price plus 100. Pinnacle's Jaguars -391 gives 79.63%. Its Browns +316 gives 24.04%. Those sum to 103.67%, so the cut is 3.67%. DraftKings' Jaguars -440 gives 81.48% and its Browns +340 gives 22.73%, summing to 104.21% for a 4.21% cut. Bovada's Jaguars -420 gives 80.77%, its Browns +315 gives 24.10%, and that sums to 104.87%, a 4.87% cut.

A second game, the same pattern

Buccaneers at Bengals (Sunday, Sep 13, 1:00 PM ET kickoff) does the same thing. Pinnacle is -208 Bengals and +180 Buccaneers, which converts to 67.53% and 35.71%, a 103.24% sum and a 3.25% cut. DraftKings is -205 and +170, converting to 67.21% and 37.04%, a 104.25% sum and a 4.25% cut. Bovada is -225 and +185, converting to 69.23% and 35.09%, a 104.32% sum and a 4.32% cut. The order doesn't repeat cleanly across the two games. Bovada is widest on both. Pinnacle and DraftKings trade places on which of them sits closer to Bovada.

GameBookFavorite priceFavorite probabilityUnderdog probabilityHold
Cleveland at JacksonvillePinnacle-39179.63%24.04%3.67%
Cleveland at JacksonvilleDraftKings-44081.48%22.73%4.21%
Cleveland at JacksonvilleBovada-42080.77%24.10%4.87%
Tampa Bay at CincinnatiPinnacle-20867.53%35.71%3.25%
Tampa Bay at CincinnatiDraftKings-20567.21%37.04%4.25%
Tampa Bay at CincinnatiBovada-22569.23%35.09%4.32%

What the hold figure actually measures

Hold is the raw two-side sum minus 100%. It is arithmetic on the book's own quoted pair. Across these two games and three books it runs from 3.25% to 4.87%. Bovada carries the widest cut on both games. Pinnacle carries the narrowest on both. That difference is real money, paid every time you bet, and no take on either team touches it. Say whatever you like about the Jaguars. The six hold numbers above don't move, because the book's own two prices set them and nothing else does.

On Cleveland-Jacksonville the distance between the widest cut and the narrowest is 4.87% minus 3.67%, which is 1.20 points. All three books quoted those same two teams within about 75 minutes of each other. On Tampa Bay-Cincinnati it is 4.32% minus 3.25%, or 1.07 points. Neither gap is about which book likes which team. Each one set its own cut, on its own, before a hot take about either game could reach it.

The odds converter turns any single price into a chance. Comparing the hold across books is a separate step, done here by hand off the live NFL odds board and the wider odds hub. A companion piece on book-shopping the hold runs this comparison across the whole slate.

These are quoted prices as they stood today. No spread, no total and no player prop went into a single number above.

What the Number Says

Six numbers, two games, three books, and Bovada charges the most on both while Pinnacle charges the least on both. Two books disagreeing on a favorite's price by 50 cents is an ordinary Tuesday. Two books disagreeing by 1.2 points of pure cut, on the same two teams, inside the same hour, is a standing tax you pay for sitting still. So shop the favorite side at Pinnacle first on either game above. In dollars per ticket it is small. Across a season it isn't. What would change the read is either book widening its cut as kickoff nears, so watch those two prices rather than the team news.

Frequently asked questions

What is "hold" in sports betting?
Convert both of a book's quoted prices on the same market and add them. The total comes out above 100%, and that excess is hold, the book's margin on that exact pair of prices.
Which book had the widest hold on the games checked here?
Bovada, at 4.87% on the Cleveland-Jacksonville game and 4.32% on the Tampa Bay-Cincinnati game, the highest of the three books on both.
Which book had the narrowest hold?
Pinnacle, at 3.67% on Cleveland-Jacksonville and 3.25% on Tampa Bay-Cincinnati, the lowest of the three on both games checked.
Does a lower hold mean a book is giving a better team-strength estimate?
No; hold measures the size of the book's margin on its own quoted pair, not whether that book's number is closer to the true chance of either team winning.
Can a converter show the hold on its own?
A converter turns one price into one probability; comparing hold requires converting both sides of the same market at more than one book and subtracting 100%, the manual step walked through above.

Build a free model in 60 seconds →

Go →
4m read time
15 players/teams
8 key angles

Angles in this read

  • Odds tick Micro tick movement reinforces live market and pricing language.
  • CLV scan A scanning underline highlights closing-line value concepts.
  • Line arrow Spread, total, and price movement sections get directional cues.
  • Research scan Tables, evidence ledgers, and inline charts receive a research-note scan cue.
  • Football thread The football animation gives NFL pages one controlled kinetic accent.
  • Line reveal Pretext-measured lines reveal without reflowing the article.

This article's context stays anchored to Updated Sep, PM ET, Bovada. Game Book Favorite, Bengals and Browns and price, american odds and implied probability, all of which appear in the post itself.

Names and terms found in this article
Updated SepPM ETBovada. Game Book FavoriteHold ClevelandJacksonville PinnacleJacksonville BovadaTampa BayCincinnati PinnacleBengalsBrownsBuccaneerspriceamerican oddsimplied probabilityodds convertermoneyline
Share this guide Help another reader make a sharper decision.

Get picks in your inbox

One email, every slate — ranked edges, no touts. Unsubscribe any time.

Start free — pick a sport

Go →

Continue with evidence

Related reading and source status

Related Reads

How to Calculate Edge in Sports Betting: Gap, Not Guessing — Shark Snip
Beginner Guides

How to Calculate Edge in Sports Betting: Gap, Not Guessing

Edge in sports betting is predicted value minus the market line — worked here on a real Week 1 house pick with the exact subtraction shown.

Sep 3, 2026 5 min read
Odds Converter, Explained With Our Own Board — Shark Snip
Strategy

Odds Converter, Explained With Our Own Board

Spread prices and moneylines both convert with the same formula but answer different questions, shown on two live Week 1 games.

Sep 3, 2026 4 min read
Pleaser Sports Betting Explained: Where Risk Compiles — Shark Snip
Strategy

Pleaser Sports Betting Explained: Where Risk Compiles

Today's three-book Week 1 spreads show where a pleaser stacks real risk: seven games agree across books, one disagrees on the favorite.

Sep 3, 2026 6 min read

query: loadMergedBlogPostCards + scoreRelated · n = 3

No data

No graded source picks match this article yet

The public.source_accuracy_scores 90-day query returned no rows for this article's inferred sport.