Skip to content
CURRENT
-7 → -6 (+1) over 24 captures ATL @ GB spread -7 → -6 house House backtest last 10: 6–4 · 90-day all-market 55.3% (n=8163) · 23h ago Wire Rams defeat depleted Giants 28-6 on 'Monday Night Football' Wire Rams' Stafford passes Rivers for 6th all time in passing TDs Wire Davante Adams, Matthew Stafford lead Rams past Giants 28-6 after Jaxson Dart's injury
Access: Anonymous access. Content follows.
shark-snips

The WR Breakout Rebuild Had No Numbers to Rebuild On

Read the price, role, and market first Five wide receivers separated by 1.22 projected points, less than one catch. The depth chart and the injury tag do the work the projection can't.

6 sections

Sample-Size Sam

Retired byline of the Shark Snip desk for accuracy-tracking coverage. Kept for the posts published under it before 2026-09-09.

Key takeaways (from article sections)

  • The five-name table this needed
  • Reading the gap column instead of guessing at it
  • What separates them once the points stop helping
  • What this table still can’t do
  • How to use the table at the table
  • The Receipts Drawer

Updated Sep 7, 2026 · Week 1 board.

The five-name table this needed

Every name below clears three checks at once. A real draft price. A FantasyPros consensus rank. And a Week 1 figure on the board.

Plenty of interesting names fail that bar, and these five clear it.

PlayerTeamProjected points, Week 1 (PPR)Board rank at receiverADPFantasyPros half-PPR WR rankGap, FantasyPros minus boardDepth chartInjury tag
Courtland SuttonDEN11.683061.233+32none
DJ MooreBUF11.593147.231+01none
Parker WashingtonJAX10.783561.727-81none
Mike EvansSF10.643656.630-61Questionable
Michael WilsonARI10.463775.638+12none

Courtland Sutton leads them at 11.68 and Michael Wilson trails at 10.46. Everything in between is inside that. In a format that pays a full point per catch, one reception on Sunday reorders this entire table. So anybody telling you which of these five to prefer, on the strength of the projection alone, is reading noise and calling it a signal.

I did that in August. The numbers were different then and the mistake was the same either way.

Reading the gap column instead of guessing at it

The gap column is the FantasyPros rank minus the board rank, so a positive number means the board rates him better than the crowd does. 3 of the five land inside three spots either way, which is agreement, not an edge. Parker Washington is the widest at -8, and it runs the opposite way from the story I told in August. FantasyPros has him twenty-seventh; the board has him 35th.

Mike Evans reads -6 the same direction. Neither of those is the board finding a bargain. It's the board being less impressed than the crowd, on two men the crowd already had cheap.

What separates them once the points stop helping

Two columns do the work the projection can't. Depth chart first. DJ Moore, Parker Washington and Mike Evans are first on their own team's chart. Courtland Sutton is second in Denver and Michael Wilson is second in Arizona, and second means somebody else eats before they do.

Then the tag. Mike Evans carries a questionable, the only one in the group, and a questionable on a first-stringer moves your Sunday more than the 1.22 points spanning this whole table. Draft price is the third thing: Moore goes at 47.2 while Wilson lasts until 75.6, and the board can't tell them apart at all.

What this table still can’t do

This table shows where three sources disagree, and by how little. It doesn't say who breaks out. Every figure here is Week 1 and nothing longer. This board does not carry a season-long number for anybody.

None of the five has a graded pick behind him either. So read the gap column as a disagreement to weigh, never as a record to trust. The Week 1 rankings page carries the full context behind each rank. The no-price breakout piece has more names the market has not priced at all.

And if these prices still feel rich for a one-week signal, our market check on three deep-ADP names goes cheaper.

How to use the table at the table

Take the cheapest starter and stop agonizing. Wilson lasts until 75.6 and projects within 1.22 of the best man here, but he's second on his own chart, so the discount is the role. Moore at 47.2 is the most expensive and the only first-stringer priced like one. If you want the version of this where somebody is actually underpriced, it isn't on this page today.

Cross-check the draft kit for where each one lands on a printed sheet.

The Receipts Drawer

A spread of 1.22 from top to bottom across five men, and one catch swallows the lot. The receipt worth keeping is that the disagreement I wrote a whole page about in August has closed to three spots or less on 3 of the five. Mike Evans is the name to watch, because his questionable tag is the only column here that will actually move before kickoff. If he's active and first on the San Francisco chart, his 10.64 is the one figure in this group I'd trust to go higher.

Pull the injury report Sunday morning and take the cheapest healthy starter of the five.

Frequently asked questions

What counts as a real number here?
A receiver with three sources at once: a draft price, a FantasyPros consensus rank, and a Week 1 figure on the projection board. Five wide receivers clear all three.
What does the gap column mean?
The FantasyPros rank minus the board rank at the position. A positive number means the board rates him better than the crowd. 3 of these five land inside three spots either way.
How far apart are these five on the board?
1.22 points from top to bottom, which is less than one reception in PPR scoring. The projection cannot separate them, so nothing on this page pretends it does.
What should separate them instead?
The depth chart and the injury tag. DJ Moore, Parker Washington and Mike Evans start for their own teams; Courtland Sutton and Michael Wilson are second on theirs, and Evans carries the group's only questionable tag.

Build a free model in 60 seconds →

Go →
5m read time
12 players/teams
8 key angles

Angles in this read

  • Edge meter Positive expected value is presented as a meter, not a guarantee.
  • Research scan Tables, evidence ledgers, and inline charts receive a research-note scan cue.
  • Target heat Target-share language gets a hotter editorial treatment.
  • Tier stack Draft tiers and rankings use stacked chip rhythm.
  • Snap meter Usage notes surface with a meter-style motion cue.
  • Line reveal Pretext-measured lines reveal without reflowing the article.

This article's context stays anchored to Updated Sep, Courtland Sutton DEN and DJ Moore BUF and injury report, price and target share, all of which appear in the post itself.

Names and terms found in this article
Updated SepCourtland Sutton DENDJ Moore BUFParker Washington JAXMike Evans SFQuestionable Michael Wilson ARICourtland SuttonMichael Wilsoninjury reportpricetarget sharefantasy wr breakoutsmarket consensus
Share this guide Help another reader make a sharper decision.

Get picks in your inbox

One email, every slate — ranked edges, no touts. Unsubscribe any time.

Start free — pick a sport

Go →

Continue with evidence

Related reading and source status

Related Reads

Fantasy Football Auction Values 2026: Price the Confidence — Shark Snip
Fantasy

Fantasy Football Auction Values 2026: Price the Confidence

2026 auction values divided by the Week 1 board: Gibbs costs $2.89 a projected point and Jalen Hurts costs 38 cents.

Sep 2, 2026 11 min read
Fantasy Auction Values 2026: Don't Pay for Last Year — Shark Snip
Fantasy

Fantasy Auction Values 2026: Don't Pay for Last Year

Eight auction tags divided by what each man projects this week. The priciest point in the room costs 1.76 times the cheapest.

Aug 28, 2026 5 min read
The Auction Guide Asked for Projections. The Receipts Say Volume. — Shark Snip
Fantasy

The Auction Guide Asked for Projections. The Receipts Say Volume.

Auction values 2026 rebuild: the top scorer earned his price on a career-high touch total, and defense prices the same way. Budget off counted usage.

Aug 28, 2026 5 min read

query: loadMergedBlogPostCards + scoreRelated · n = 3

No data

No graded source picks match this article yet

The public.source_accuracy_scores 90-day query returned no rows for this article's inferred sport.