Skip to content
Access: Anonymous access. Content follows.
Reading progress is unavailable until the article can be measured.
learn

NFL Futures Portfolio 2026: Building Positions Without Overexposure

Read the price, role, and market first No futures market exists this week, so we teach implied win chances and Kelly sizing using real Week 1 moneylines instead.

5 sections

The House

Renamed to Model Desk on 2026-09-09. Kept for the posts published under the old name.

Updated Sep 7, 2026 · Week 1 board.

There is no futures market this week, so we build on what is here

We checked. The board holds 16 Week 1 game lines, each with a spread, a total and a moneyline, at three books. There is no separate market for win totals, division winners, conference odds or a Super Bowl price anywhere in it. A futures piece quoting a specific future price here would be making it up. So the mechanics run on real Week 1 moneylines instead. The arithmetic does not change between a moneyline and a division-odds future. The market does.

Turning a moneyline into an implied win chance

A moneyline price is not a win chance. The book's margin is sitting inside it. For a negative price, take the price and divide it by the price with 100 added. For a positive price, take 100 and divide it by the price with 100 added. Add the two sides and the total comes in above 100%. The excess is the margin, the vig. Each side divided by that total gives a fair, book-specific chance. Two Week 1 games show the contrast.

GameBookMoneyline (home/away)Win chance, homeWin chance, away
New Orleans at DetroitPinnacle−321 / +26773.7%26.3%
New Orleans at DetroitDraftKings−305 / +24572.2%27.8%
New Orleans at DetroitBovada−350 / +27574.5%25.5%
Buffalo at HoustonPinnacle−108 / −10450.5%49.5%
Buffalo at HoustonDraftKings−110 / −11050.0%50.0%

Detroit is priced as a heavy favorite at every book, 72% to 75% depending on which one you open. Buffalo at Houston is as near a coin flip as this board gets. A futures price converts the same way. A division number or a win-total over-under goes through the division a moneyline goes through. The only piece missing is a futures price to put into it.

Sizing a position: the Kelly fraction, and our own cap

Once your own win chance differs from the market's, the Kelly criterion (a stake-sizing formula) turns that difference into a bet size. It weighs the edge against the payout and hands back a share of bankroll. In words, the fraction is your win chance times the net odds, minus the chance you lose, all divided by the net odds. Our own published picks show it running. Take Buffalo at Houston. Our stated chance there is 0.581 at −102, which puts the net odds near 0.98. Full Kelly on that is roughly 15.4% of bankroll. Our recommended stake is 3.84%, near enough a quarter of it. The Green Bay-Minnesota spread pick, at a stated chance of 0.5615 and the same −102 price, lands the same way. Full Kelly is near 11.4% and our stake is 2.86%. Of the 283 published picks carrying a stake figure, 136 sit at exactly 5%. That looks like a cap at 5% of bankroll no matter what quarter-Kelly would ask for on a confident pick. We checked two picks. We state that as consistent with a quarter-Kelly rule capped at 5%, and not as a written policy.

A portfolio is many small positions, not one big one

The word portfolio is doing real work in that sentence. One 5%-of-bankroll position on one game is a bet. Spreading the same total risk across the 16 games on the Week 1 board, each with its own price and its own edge or absence of one, is what a portfolio means. Many small positions, largely independent of each other, instead of one story. We hold no correlation figure between games, so we won't put a number on the benefit. More independent positions still beats one large position at the same total stake. Our own 5% cap is the visible, sourced example of that discipline being enforced by the machinery rather than left to the bettor.

Sources

We checked two things, converting Week 1 moneylines into win chances and sizing a stake against them, both off our own published picks and timestamped below. The method is what this page is worth. No futures price exists to apply it to, and nothing here has settled. Every edge and stake figure above is a pre-game estimate. Size accordingly, and watch for a market to actually post futures prices before you treat a division or Super Bowl number as real. The full 16-game Week 1 board sits at /odds. Every edge and stake figure we publish, not only the two used above, is at /picks/nfl. A standalone converter for your own book's price sits at /desk/tools/odds-converter. The same projection-against-market method, run on one position instead of a slate, is at TE premium strategy.

Frequently asked questions

Does our data include NFL futures odds, like win totals, division or Super Bowl prices?
No. We hold Week 1 game lines only, spread, total and moneyline. No futures market appears in our data.
How do you turn a moneyline into a win chance?
Take the cut out first. Convert each side to a raw chance, then divide each by the total of the two so they add to 100%. Detroit at -321 to -350 across three books comes out at 72% to 75%.
What does the Kelly criterion recommend for a stake?
It weighs your edge against the payout and hands back a stake size. In words, your win chance times the net odds, minus the chance you lose, divided by the net odds. The reference is linked in the body.
Do we actually use quarter-Kelly sizing?
On the two picks we checked, Buffalo at Houston plus the Green Bay-Minnesota spread, our published stake is about one-quarter of full Kelly, capped at 5% of bankroll.
How many of our published picks hit the 5% cap?
136 of the 283 picks that carry a stake figure.
Share this guide Help another reader make a sharper decision.

Get picks in your inbox

One email, every slate — ranked edges, no touts. Unsubscribe any time.

Continue with evidence

Related reading and source status

Related Reads

Week 5 Fantasy Player Projections — Shark Snip
NFL

Week 5 Fantasy Player Projections

See the Week 5 projection board: top kicker Brandon Aubrey (DAL) scores 10.8 points.

Oct 7, 2026 2 min read
Week 5 Model Picks Explained — Shark Snip
NFL

Week 5 Model Picks Explained

See the model's 63.6% record, 12 games with picks, and several positive edges led by MIA's 29.3 percentage points.

Oct 7, 2026 2 min read
Week 3 Fantasy Projections: Every Position — Shark Snip
NFL

Week 3 Fantasy Projections: Every Position

Week 3 fantasy projections: Pineiro 9.9, Allen 23.6, Gibbs 25.3, McBride 16.5, Smith-Njigba 20.8.

Sep 24, 2026 3 min read

3 related posts

No data

No graded picks from this article's sources yet

No tracked source has a graded 90-day record for this sport yet. Source scorecards fill after their picks are graded. The house record is separate: see /picks.